Comparison of Readability and Sharpness of Different Professional Displays

Steffen Reichel1, Karlheinz Blankenbach2, Andreas Reber2
  1. 1Faculty of Engineering, Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences
  2. 2Hochschule Pforzheim, Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences

steffen [dot] reichel [at] hs-pforzheim [dot] de

Professional displays must fulfill demanding specifications like readability in ambient light and sharpness of text. This is somewhat contractionary as anti-glare (AG) films are good for reflection reduction but reduce sharpness. We present measurements in dark room using a spotlight and large flat light source (both WLED) and an imaging light measurement device. The set-up is in specular geometry adapted from ISO 15008. The spotlight represents for example office lights and sun. Reflections from e.g., shirts, walls, windows, and sky are simulated by a flat lamp. The ambient light performance was rated by the reflectance characteristics (specular, haze, diffuse). The sharpness was measured using a macro lens via luminance profiles of neighboring pixels and the modulation transfer function (MTF). The results of four professional monitors for a safety-critical application in well light offices including an expert evaluation are: Anti-reflection (AR) has the highest sharpness, but it’s sharp contours of reflections are annoying. AG-only displays results in a relative high reflectance and low sharpness. The combination of AR with moderate AG is the best, but most expensive solution.

Manuscript not yet submitted.
Submit Manuscript
@inproceedings{dgao127-a1, title = {Comparison of Readability and Sharpness of Different Professional Displays}, author = {Steffen Reichel, Karlheinz Blankenbach, Andreas Reber}, booktitle = {DGaO-Proceedings, 127. Jahrestagung}, year = {2026}, publisher = {Deutsche Gesellschaft für angewandte Optik e.V.}, issn = {1614-8436}, note = {Talk A1} }
127. Annual Conference of the DGaO · Hamburg · 2026